Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Shumar Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Shumar Fm base reconstruction

Shumar Fm


Period: 
Neogene, Quaternary

Age Interval: 
Pliocene - Early Pleistocene


Province: 
NW.India Rajastan-Jaisalmer Basin

Type Locality and Naming

OUTCROP. Narayan et al. (1961) proposed this sequence as “Shumar Formation” by grouping together the conglomerate and lateritic sequences generally overlying the Eocene rocks after the type locality Shumarwali Talai. [Original Publication: Narayanan K. 1959. Progress report on the geological work in Jaisalmer, ONGC report (Unpublished)]. Reference well: Well Kharatar-2: K.B 107.68m, drilled depth 2067m and interval 00-247m. II) and well Lang-I: K.: 76.52m drilled depth 1854m and interval 00-723m.


Lithology and Thickness

Conglomerate and sandstone. The formation in the outcrop is mainly composed of conglomerate with streaks of sandstone and silty clays. The topmost surface shows lateralization. In well Kharatar-2, the formation is mainly represented by sandstone, conglomerate gravels, variegated clay and thin bed of sandy limestone. The lower part of the formation comprises fine-grained sandstone, conglomerate at places, with streaks of variegated clay and ferruginous matter. This unit grades upward to conglomerate/gravels, fine- to medium-grained sandstone with gravels to quartz, occasional thin intercalations of variegated clay and limestone streak. The succeeding litho-associations of buff to orange, hard, sandy limestone and thin intercalation of calcareous sandstone, the topmost part is of windblown sand buff to grey clayey sandstone and sandy clays. Thickness in the type section is 9.5 m (Narayan et al., 1961) whereas Dasgupta (1974) reported it around 30 m. In subsurface, it attains a thickness of 761 m in the western part of Shahgarh sub-basin (well Dangiwala-I).

[Figure 1: Location map of West Rajasthan Basins (after Pandey and Dave, 1998)]

[Figure 2: Generalized and Subsurface Stratigraphy of Jaisalmer Basin (from dghindia.gov.in)]


Lithology Pattern: 
Conglomerate


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The lower boundary is unconformably overlies Bandah Fm.

Upper contact

Upper boundary is overlain by windblown recent sand dunes.

Regional extent

[Figure 3: Stratigraphic Correlation of Rajasthan Basins (from dghindia.gov.in)]


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[70.32,27.14],[71.87,27.6],[71.63,27.42],[71.98,27.15],[71.63,26.44],[71.01,26.32],[70.7,26.52],[70.32,27.14]]]]}}

Fossils

Lukose (1974) has reported some rare palynomorphs such as Tricolpites sp., Triporites sp., Tetrapoorites sp. and Tricolporites sp which do not indicate specific age.


Age 

Pliocene - Early Pleistocene (From 5.33 to 1.8 Ma)

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Messinian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.9

    Beginning date (Ma): 
5.53

    Ending stage: 
Gelasian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.4

    Ending date (Ma):  
2.27

Depositional setting

Presence of conglomerate beds, gravels, coarse-grained, nodular and ferruginous sandstone often lateritic and occasional limestone bands, suggest the deposition in complex depositional environment, like fluvial, lacustrine and eolian.


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

D.S.N Raju